together they moved it on the nok 7.3 billion compared to the original proposed budget. The government does not use more oljepenger and is not for any major cuts.
instead collected money from efficiency improvements, asylfeltet, dividends from companies and the treasury department’s ymsepost. It is a slight concern and a bit easy, summarizes the chief economist Harald Magnus Andreassen of Swedbank.
They have the money to spare because it came fewer asylum seekers. There is nothing wrong in using them, but basically could they the passed into the treasury again, ” says Andreassen to the NTB.
see also: Solberg: Has listened to the Sector and Left
Store: Important to get in the country on a budget
the State increase the demand on dividend
He believes the government did not discuss why they suddenly have more money to spend from effektiviseringsarbeidet in the public sector.
– This is money the government should have been available already in the proposals for the national budget, ” he says.
He sets himself also requesting that the state increase the demand dividends from the companies.
– It is justified why you think it is appropriate. It is possible companies have had very good results, but you should discuss it out from the state’s purposes with the companies, he says.
see also: the Confidence of the Solberg plunges
Get influxes of asylum seekers to pay for the government’s budsjettavtale
– Being more expensive for the community
Sjeføkonomen believe it can be an expensive shift to green change the government adds up to. It is much more effective to do than to subsidise, he points out.
– This is the broad consensus among economists. Subsidies need to be covered again, and then it becomes more expensive for the community, ” he says.
see also:, Carl I. Hagen, fear of the Frp be reduced by half: – Set hard against hard!
No comments:
Post a Comment